Talk:Domnall mac Murchada/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: J Milburn (talk · contribs) 09:12, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
What an interesting-sounding topic. Happy to offer a review. Josh Milburn (talk) 09:12, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
- Could we have a link for Donnchad (Domnall's brother), even if red? If he was a later kind, he's surely notable?
- The tern "overlord" is never properly explained, I don't think, and it does seem to be key to understanding the article.
- "unable to ride out the revolt" What do you mean by this?
- "Within the year, the Annals of Inisfallen, the Annals of the Four Masters, and the Annals of Ulster reveal" This isn't quite right. I think you mean that these various works reveal that within the year x happened, not that their revelation of x occurred within the year.
The images are fine, the sources are excellent (I'm not going to quibble about any formatting worries). Although I did struggle to follow the narrative, this is because of the complex relationships and my ignorance of Irish names- the writing is very strong. Josh Milburn (talk) 09:56, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
- I think I've taken care of things. Donnchad is now wiki-linked. I added a family tree at the beginning as well. I've expanded things a bit to show that Toirdelbach's actions in Leinster, before Diarmait's death, were meant to quell the Uí Chennselaig infighting; and that his actions in Leinster and Dublin after Diarmait's death were undertaken in the context of striving for the high-kingship. I reworded the 'ride out' bit and used 'continue on with', and took care of the annals bit you spotted. I also converted a note about the poem into a quote box.--Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 00:17, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
- Looking through again, I'm more than happy that this ready for GA status. A very strong article- great work. Josh Milburn (talk) 16:11, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review Josh.--Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 23:40, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
- Looking through again, I'm more than happy that this ready for GA status. A very strong article- great work. Josh Milburn (talk) 16:11, 3 October 2015 (UTC)