A fact from Dominic of Evesham appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 8 March 2009, and was viewed approximately 320 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
All the journals are peer-reviewed academic journals, and likewise, the books and e-material are published by respected presses and authored by 20th-century experts in the field./Writings, para 3 needs an inline citation per MOS:SUBSTANTIATE.
Although WP:ALTTEXT is not mandatory, it seems increasingly recommended.
Overall:
Pass or Fail:
A couple of prose suggestions, for the future perhaps, and certainly nothing to hold up promotion over. (Emphasis on "Suggestions"!) SN5412917:29, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Duplication of "works" at end of the lead.
Ditto "probably born...probably raised..."
"he became prior of Evesham" -- perhaps "was elected the Abbey's prior" to save duplicating Evesham.
"He had been replaced as prior by 1150" is pretty short; how about combining it with the preceding sentence; as in: "He may have witnessed a further charter of Foliot's in 1133, but is known to have been replaced as prior by 1150".
Should Latin titles use {{lang|la-x-medieval|---}}
I generally don't bother - we use too many templates as it is, honestly. I don't see what that template gains the reader. Ealdgyth (talk) 21:04, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Might be worth linking Relics; it's one of those words that everyone thinks they know but is a bit more specific than they realise.
"a 13th-century manuscript, which is an early collection of some of the works" -- "a 13th-century collection of several of his writings". Tighter and avoids duplicating "works" from the previous sentence.
"that he had altered both by omitting information and adding information" -- perhaps "that he had altered each by both omitting and adding information"?
"is not like Dominic's" -- is dissimilar to?
"according to D. C. Cox" -- now just Cox, introduced in the previous para.
"His most influential work" -- Dominic's, as the last chap mentioned was Cox.
