Talk:Dominic Caserta

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group.

California

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Government Jobs

Hi all, I created a section on allegations again Caserta, but I am not super knowledgeable about local government, so if someone could proofread the article for proper verbage that would be great. Thanks! Basilosauridae (talk) 06:23, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sexual misconduct allegations

Hi, with the section regarding the allegations. The case was dismissed due to a lack of evidence. See hereThe level of detail that this section goes into is biased and one can only assume the additional mentions of what was allegedly said were politically motivated. I purposed that the article should be changed to state that the allegations were made, but the case was dismissed. With an unbiased level of detail for both sides. Thanks! WhistleRecall (talk) 22:31, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thanks for your comments. I agree that the level of detail and tone regarding the allegations can be cut and improved and that we should include properly cited information about the case dismissal. I’m happy to work on that when I have time, or feel free to take a crack at it and we can discuss from there. I would disagree with any edits completely removing the allegations. ^†Basilosauridae ❯❯❯Talk 22:48, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've taken a shot at editing to reduce the level of detail. Please review and comment. Thank you. 18:24, 8 March 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by WhistleRecall (talk • contribs)

Source Deletion

Hi, two of the sources previously used in the article have been deleted from the site. I have not been able to find anything to replace. If anyone wishes to replace, please do. If not I will remove in the coming weeks. Thanks WhistleRecall (talk) 22:02, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,Basilosauridae you mentioned that something can be done regarding deleted sources. What can be done? Thank you WhistleRecall (talk) 21:34, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Dominic Caserta.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:23, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]