Talk:Domhnall mac Raghnaill/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

I'll be reviewing this article shortly. Ealdgyth - Talk 14:12, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
needs a citation on one quotation
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Specific concerns

You mention his date range in the intro, but not in the origins section. Should say that somewhere in the beginnings of Origins. This will make the fact that Hugh MacDonald claimed his father was a 14th century figure a bit more obviously wrong.
Need a citation for the second quotation in "Annals" section
Any reason for the two forced spaces between the end of the "Domhall.." block quote and the ref # (7 in this case)?

I've put the article on hold for seven days to allow folks to address the issues I've brought up. Feel free to contact me on my talk page, or here with any concerns, and let me know one of those places when the issues have been addressed. If I may suggest that you strike out, check mark, or otherwise mark the items I've detailed, that will make it possible for me to see what's been addressed, and you can keep track of what's been done and what still needs to be worked on. Ealdgyth - Talk 14:27, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Sorted. The forced space was eliminated. It was only there by accident. Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 06:44, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]