Talk:Domestic canary

Birds Low‑importance

Domestic canary is part of WikiProject Birds, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative and easy-to-use ornithological resource. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Please do not substitute this template.BirdsWikipedia:WikiProject BirdsTemplate:WikiProject Birdsbird articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Birds To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Endemic birds of Papua New Guinea (more)
Cleanup : Bullfinch • Vesper sparrow • Bird flight • Bird bath (more)
Copyedit : Plushcap • Magpie duck • Saker falcon (more)
Expand : Phalarope • Nidicolous • Gouldian finch • Cathartes • Cnemophilidae • Avian malaria (more)
NPOV : Debeaking • Driven grouse shooting • Abu Dhabi Falcon Hospital (more)
Stubs : Cathartiformes • Semiplumbeous hawk • Rainbow-bearded Thornbill • Sunda scops owl (more)
Update : Coal tit • Scottish crossbill • New Caledonian lorikeet • Operation Migration (more)
Verify : Argus (bird) • Blyth's frogmouth • Nik Borrow • Pytilia • Fregata • Chestnut-headed tesia • Darter • Pallid scops owl • Starling (more)
Wikify : Ninox boobook ocellata • The Institute for Bird Populations (more)
Other : Add photos to bird articles needing photos (search Flickr for free images). Add taxonomic authorities to genus articles.

More outstanding tasks at the project's cleanup listing, Category:Birds articles needing attention, and Wikipedia:WikiProject Birds/Todo.

Text and/or other creative content from this version of Atlantic canary was copied or moved into Domestic canary with this edit on 23 March 2006. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Main photo

That bird looks far more like a wild canary than a domesticated variety - would anyone mind if I upload a better picture? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.101.2.10 (talk) 02:18, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think that is a good idea. The classic canary image is one of a yellow canary but I havent found one yet. --Illume1999 (talk) 12:24, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support--Greenfinch100 16:00, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Go for it

Merge it

Merged

Miner's Canary -- Domestic Canary have now been merged. --Greenfinch100 10:20, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Petey"

I grew up with a canary named Petey, and if you do a search, you will find that this has been a very common name given to canaries, comparable to Rover or Fido for a dog. The name can be traced at least as far back as the 1943 Looney Tune "Puss 'n' Booty," which predates Tweety. I wonder if this cartoon is the source of the name's popularity or if it already was popular before. If the cartoon is the source, then that fact might be notable. Richard K. Carson (talk) 05:15, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lifespan

Currently there is no information regarding lifespan of the Canary (wild or domestic), I was navigating this page to find this exact information and would appreciate anyone that has a reference or information about this to edit and update thanks

A pet canary can live anywhere between 8-10 years on average, although I have had pet owners who have had birds live as long as 18 years- and sang right to the end of their lives! This is certainly the exception rather than the norm, however.http://www.americansingercanary.com/carefaq.htm --Illume1999 (talk) 12:32, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Use in coalmines

The article says "signs of distress from the bird" warned miners to leave the mine. WiseGeek makes a more plausible claim that "As long as the bird kept singing, the miners knew their air supply was safe. A dead canary signaled an immediate evacuation." I would not describe death as a sign of distress. No source I can find on line gives any serious documentation of how, or how often canaries were actually used. Can good sources be found? Colin McLarty (talk) 23:18, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

typical color

I had always thought that canaries were yellow, and see I was wrong. I think though that a lot of people associate canaries with yellow, hence "canary yellow". I suspect that most birdsellers sell mostly yellow canaries. Google images shows a majority of yellow canaries. I wonder if some mention could be made of this, with a reworking of "varieties" and "competitions" to highlight the hobby. --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 15:49, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Domestic canary. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140221235730/http://www.organismnames.com/details.htm?lsid=4495159 to http://www.organismnames.com/details.htm?lsid=4495159

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:11, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't it a form, not subspecies?

It seems that neither Template:Subspeciesbox nor Template:Infraspeciesbox support forms though. So what should we do? Grey Clownfish (talk) 00:03, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]