Talk:Domenico Grasso

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Conflict of Interest

Please see note on your talk page. Kim Dent-Brown ^(Talk) 17:59, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Even if this page isn't speedily deleted, it may very well fail an Articles for Deletion discussion under WP:BIO or WP:PROF. And that said, your edits to this article violate WP:COI as well.DJBullfish (talk) 18:01, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

—Preceding unsigned comment added by Domenicograsso (talk • contribs) 18:06, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As the originating editor, the responsibility for verifying this information and inserting appropriate citations to reliable sources is yours. PS: if you sign your posts with ~~~~ your signature will appear - like this: Kim Dent-Brown ^(Talk) 18:08, 24 January 2008 (UTC)==Speedy Deletion==[reply]

Comment I've removed the speedy deletion tag, as the article does appear to assert notability. Whether the article *does* per WP:BIO or WP:PROF is best left settled by an AfD (Articles for Deletion) discussion. I'm neutral on the subject so I don't think I'm the best person to start the AfD - but it does probably need to be started. Regardless, the article DOES fail WP:COI and needs rewriting and/or attributions on the part of third parties or else it the article is going to have problems staying on Wikipedia.DJBullfish (talk) 18:10, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with others that this article seems to exhibit conflict of interest, i.e. I strongly suspect it was written by the subject himself, or by someone he knows personally. That's not to say it deserves deletion... There are a lot of very unknown people (usually in the more "exotic" side of the film industry) who have been given their own Wikipedia articles. So it's not such a bad idea to have an article on a distinguished scientist who none of us have heard of. The problem is WHO wrote the article. Wikipedia can't be used as an extension of someone's resume. 64.26.155.230 (talk) 22:04, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]