Jump to content

Talk:Doedicurus

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Doedicurus/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Hog Farm (talk · contribs) 22:25, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Criteria

[edit]

1. Prose  On hold

2. Verifiability  On hold

3. Depth of Coverage  Pass

4. Neutral  Pass

5. Stable  Pass

6. Illustrations  Pass

7. Miscellaneous  Pass

Comments

[edit]

1.

  • Link carapace in the lead, as well as the first mention in the prose. It's not that common of a term, at least for readers without a robust biology background (currently linked at the second point in the prose)
done   User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk  20:36, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Link Smilodon at the first instance, rather than the second
done   User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk  20:36, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Camels is a duplink
fixed   User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk  20:36, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2.

  • Note a should probably have a citation directly attached to it, as it's making a statement that an assumption is incorrect. Even if it's from the same source as where the information in the sentence the note accompanies comes from, it should have a citation to make it clear where the information is coming from.
done   User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk  20:36, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Spot check on the refs should all checked instances supported by the reference and all linked refs tests working.

3.

4.

5.

6.

  • Image licensing looks good. Consider adding alt text, but that's not a GA requirement

7.

Placing on hold, just a little tightening up to do here. Good work. Hog Farm (talk) 18:27, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]