Talk:Doctors' Trial/Archive 1
This is an archive of past discussions about Doctors' Trial. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
Dr. Bruder
I have heard that Dr.Bruder was a witness at the Doctors Trials and am interested in what became of her since 1955 when she was the doctor at my birth (Central Middlesex Hospital) London.
!!!!!!!! GUYS I AM GERMAN AND I HAVE TO SAY SORRY BUT IT IS NOT NUREMBERG! IT IS NUERNBERG OR IF YOU WANT TO USE THE CORRECT GERMAN FORM NÜRNBERG!!!!! PLEASE FIX THIS NOW THIS IS VERY VERY VERY BA
- Sheesh. "Nuremberg" is the English name of "Nürnberg". No need to SHOUT. Lupo 22:57, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
SS as a prerequisite for death sentence
I think the line "Generally, the difference between receiving a prison term and the death sentence was membership of "an organization declared criminal by the judgement of the International Military Tribunal", the SS." is to general and inaccurate.
Out of the 9 members of the SS, 3 are given prison senctences. In my view it is false to say, if you were indicted for being a member of the SS you would be sentenced to death.
martijn (talk) 08:30, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
Link
Link to Nazi Doctors http://paolosilv.wordpress.com/2012/02/02/nazi-doctors-mauthausen-and-gusen-others/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.49.242.65 (talk) 18:49, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
Prof. Beiglböck
He was originally sentenced to 15 years imprisonment. (See e.G. Landsberg ein Dokumentarischer Bericht, Information Services Division Office of the High Commissioner for Germany, München, no year given. --Bühler 04:18, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Correction
Only 20 of the 23 doctors were medical doctors, not all 23 as previously stated. I came accross this error while working on my Ahnenerbe article. I'm not logged into my account because I'm not at home, so when I make changes I try and put something on the discussion board -Foxhunt King 00:29, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
- Indeed that's right, but you got the names wrong. Schröder and Weltz were MDs all right, as stated at de:Nürnberger_Ärzteprozess and as testified by their titles ("Arzt" means MD in German). Lupo 11:43, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
Ranks
Just for accuracy, Generalleutnant is not equivalent to Major General, but to Lieutenant General, and Generaloberst means Colonel General. Fixed the errors. --Jagtai (talk) 11:10, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
question...
The article currently says: "These trials were held before U.S. military courts, not before the International Military Tribunal..."
Does this mean that the trials were conventional courts martial? I think this should be clarified. Geo Swan (talk) 18:19, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
- Short answer, no. Court martials are reserved for members of the military. This was a military court proceeding (a tribunal) operated in an occupied country that falls under military jurisdiction. No clarification is required.--Yachtsman1 (talk) 21:51, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
Mazal Library
The site seems to be unreachable as of today...--Alexandre Rongellion (talk) 00:55, 19 February 2011 (UTC) I am surprized to see this article in the category of "medecine", since this trial talks about the negation of medecine. Wouldn't it be more relevant to just classify it in the HISTORY AND THE THIRD REICH ?--Alexandre Rongellion (talk) 00:59, 19 February 2011 (UTC) i added the link to the Harvard online library for the Nuremberg trial which is the reference,and removed the link to the British site which is sloppy and lacking of scientific earnest.--Alexandre Rongellion (talk) 01:07, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
Move discussion in progress
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Auschwitz Trial which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 13:13, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Doctors' trial. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110415082417/http://nuremberg.law.harvard.edu/NurTranscript/TranscriptSearches/tran_about.php to http://nuremberg.law.harvard.edu/NurTranscript/TranscriptSearches/tran_about.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:14, 11 September 2017 (UTC)