Talk:Doctor of Civil Law

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

University of Oxford Low‑importance

	University of Oxford portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the University of Oxford on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of OxfordWikipedia:WikiProject University of OxfordTemplate:WikiProject University of OxfordUniversity of Oxford articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Higher education

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education articles

jurisdiction of the chancellor?

the article states that,

"The British Sovereign is unable to receive university degrees, since these would, theoretically, place her under the jurisdiction of the Chancellor of the university. Prior to her accession, the present Queen did accept several honorary degrees, including an Oxford DCL in 1948)"

Yet it gives no indication or link to an article that would provide indication, as to what the "jurisdiction of the chancellor" entails. Further source needed?

Hypnoticmonkey (talk) 01:56, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That actually might not be accurate anymore, especially if the degree is honourary (which involves no subordination whatsoever), because of the now well-established constitutional distinction between the person of the sovereign and the crown as an abstract concept (viz. the same personal sovereign being coextensive with 32 separate and distinct national, state and provincial crowns - as the Queen in Right of Canada, the Queen in Right of Ontario, the Queen in Right of Jamaica, the Queen in Right of New South Wales, etc.). The idea that the monarch cannot accept degrees for the reason cited is, however, an excellent excuse to relieve him/her from causing offence by having to choose between the innumerable honourary degrees that s/he would be offered but for the fact s/he theoretically cannot accept them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.162.218.153 (talk) 10:42, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]