Talk:Doctor Who specials (2013)

Doctor Who specials (2013) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: September 23, 2019. (Reviewed version).

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Doctor Who specials (2013) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Doctor Who High‑importance

	Doctor Who portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Doctor Who, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Doctor Who and its spin-offs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this notice, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Doctor WhoWikipedia:WikiProject Doctor WhoTemplate:WikiProject Doctor WhoDoctor Who articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television: Episode coverage Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.

BBC Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks for WikiProject BBC:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Improve BBC, BBC News (TV channel) and BBC News to Good Article status following previous reviews, create BBC Computer Literacy Project (in light of forthcoming 30th anniversary)
Cleanup : Chucklevision - references and general clean-up, Pebble Mill Studios - over-detailed and long, BBC World Service Television - unreferenced and confusing
Copyedit : BBC News, Broadcasting House
Expand : Top 20 start-class BBC articles with most importance: BBC Japan, BBC World Service Television, BBC Lifestyle, BBC Two Northern Ireland
NPOV : Criticism of the BBC (See comments)
Stubs : Stub-Class BBC articles
Other : *Restructure the category
- Add infoboxes to the BBC articles without infoboxes
- Add free-use images to biographical articles where possible
- Add references to Goa Mix (see assessment) and Coat of arms of the BBC
- Return Dad's Army to a Good article. (See comments)
- Reassess BBC following improvements to article.

Science Fiction Low‑importance

	Speculative fiction portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Audio Drama Special?

Can anybody tell me why the edit about the Christmas special by an IP keeps being reverted? there have been 798 episodes so far. That makes the Christmas special the 800th. What isn't verifiable about that? Bestbaggiesfan (talk) 16:46, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No one's disputing that it's the 800th episode. The problem is that there's no proof of notability. If the BBC starts advertising the Christmas special as the 800th episode, or some prominent sources make the observation that it's the 800th episode, then it can be mentioned – until then it's trivia. —Flax5 17:31, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You say this but "The Crimson Horror" was the 100th episode of Doctor Who since it has been revived and that is noted on Wikipedia. Bestbaggiesfan (talk) 12:46, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If there's no reliable source that says that it's notable, then that should be removed as well. DonQuixote (talk) 04:30, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Colour of episode table

Is it just me or is anybody else struggling to see the letters 'AI' in the column between 'UK viewers' and 'Original air date'? I originally thought the column was completely empty! Bestbaggiesfan ✉ 11:35, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Addition of the War Doctor

Are we now not to count David Tennant as the Eleventh Doctor and Matt Smith as the Twelfth Doctor? In Defense of the Artist (talk) 03:25, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind "The War Doctor" is indeed the ninth incarnation of the Time Lord that we know as the doctor, but doesn't count as a "Doctor". David Tennant then is the Eleventh Incarnation, but still the Tenth Doctor, etc. ^[1] In Defense of the Artist (talk) 03:29, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

^ http://www.doctorwhotv.co.uk/moffat-the-doctor-numbering-stays-exactly-the-same-55354.htm

Image?

Can, for example, a boxset image be added? 75.156.69.71 (talk) 02:00, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There is no boxset for these specials - they were all released individually - maybe we can have a collage or something like that? Etron81 (talk) 16:46, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttp://www.doctorwhotv.co.uk/moffat-the-doctor-numbering-stays-exactly-the-same-55354.htm

[1]