Talk:Dobiński's formula
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
"Summirung der Reihe [...]"
[edit]Here [1] is another authoritative reference for the use of the old orthography in this title (in addition to this [2]). --80.129.82.40 (talk) 13:44, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
Here [3] and here [4] you can see the old orthography in use. --80.129.82.40 (talk) 13:56, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
And this Google scan [5] is even more conclusive. --80.129.82.40 (talk) 14:35, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
This article should be entitled Dobiński’s formula rather than Dobinski’s formula. Best wishes, T. 148.88.200.28 (talk) 10:30, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
The summation should start from k=1 since the first term in the calculation of zeroth Bell number is 0 to the 0 which is undefined. Kdpw (talk) 15:51, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
- Nothing is more defined than 0 to the 0, which is 1, indeedpma 23:53, 13 December 2018 (UTC).