Talk:Doñana National Park

Untitled

It is incorrect to call the Iberian Lynx spanish lynx, since it also exists in Portugal

Atlantis? Come on....

You devote far to much time to a fringe theory about Doñana being Atlantis. Historians agree Atlantis has never existed; those who look for it are just too desperate to find it. Even so, the theory is mentioned in the introduction and given a section comprising about half the main body. It would make about as much sense to devote half the article about the Mayas to Von Däniken's "ancient astronauts". Steinbach (talk) 13:26, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

A reasonable argument. Looks like a prime opportunity to boldly edit! Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:06, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

I have removed dubious info about "lost city of Atlantis", as well as images that cluttered up the article and made text harder to read. Carlstak (talk) 17:13, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

Thanks a lot. Maybe it wasn't even necessary to remove all of it, but I certainly prefer it this way. Steinbach (talk) 18:05, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

If it does belong in the article, and I'm not sure it does, it would definitely not belong in the lead. Since they never definitively proved that it was Atlantis, at best it's a hypothesis, but without context or other facts, it seems unimportant. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:38, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

Area and "conversions"

This article gives the area as 543 km² (209.65 sq mi) , of which 135 km² (52.12 sq mi). However the origial Spanish article gives the area as 104.970 ha (50.720 ha en el Parque Nacional, y 54.250 ha en el Parque Natural) with a "Superficie 53.709 ha" in the infobox. Note the use of the "." as a thousands marker. That would give 1,049.7 km² (405.29 sq mi) (of which 507.2 km² or 195.83 sq mi in the National Park) with an area of 537.09 km² (207.37 sq mi) in the infobox. Something does not add up here. At any rate, the original square mile "conversions" were way off the mark, which is an additional reason for the universal use of Template:Convert. Peter Horn User talk 14:33, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

(of which 507.2 km² or 195.83 sq mi in the National Park) and 542.5 km² or 209.46 sq mi in the natural reserve). Peter Horn User talk 14:49, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Doñana National Park. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130409081737/http://www.ramsar.org/cda/en/ramsar-documents-list/main/ramsar/1-31-218_4000_0__ to http://www.ramsar.org/cda/en/ramsar-documents-list/main/ramsar/1-31-218_4000_0__
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071031161654/http://reddeparquesnacionales.mma.es/en/parques/org_auto/red_ppnn/parques/05_donana.htm to http://reddeparquesnacionales.mma.es/en/parques/org_auto/red_ppnn/parques/05_donana.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:48, 16 December 2016 (UTC)