Talk:Dmytro Vyshnevetsky

Ukraine High‑importance

	Ukraine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ukraine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ukraine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.UkraineWikipedia:WikiProject UkraineTemplate:WikiProject UkraineUkraine articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Religion

Are you sure that Dmytro Vyshnevetsky was Eastern orthodox ? 89.80.157.163 04:11, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I don't know for sure, but I believe he was. His relative (was he cousin or what..) Yarema Vyshnevetsky was a convert to Catholicism from Orthodoxy, so his family might have been Orthodox as well. —dima/s-ko/ 04:24, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No doubt he was, as well as famous/infamous Jarema just before Khmelnycky rebellion. "Bajda" needs better article, i`ll work it up soon.Mikołajski (talk) 05:48, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sure he was.--Nazar Saman (talk) 18:43, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Title

RE He was the first true Cossack hetman in history

Dmytro Wishnevetsky was really the first Cossak leader, however, he never titled himself hetman. Nor the idea of "Cossac hetmans" existed at the time of his life. --Nazar Saman (talk) 10:19, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV

This article is not really to do with Ukraine any more than it is to do with other current political entities in the region. Someone is going around prefixing everything with the word Ukraine for obvious political agenderising. For a start he was a Ruthenian, and the term and concept of an identity called "Ukraine" didn't exist when he was alive. This article should not be placed under things like "Ukrainian leaders" and "Ukrainian history", any more than it should be put under "Ukrainian teapots", it is about the history of Cossacks and maybe the history of Slavs. This and other articles like it need to be cleaned up and de-politicised, and supporting evidence provided for all these attempts at "Ukrainisation" of history: it's propaganda. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.208.52.129 (talk) 09:10, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]