A fact from Divya Saxena appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 7 June 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is part of WikiProject Cricket which aims to expand and organise information better in articles related to the sport of cricket. Please participate by visiting the project and talk pages for more details.CricketWikipedia:WikiProject CricketTemplate:WikiProject Cricketcricket
There is a toolserver based WikiProject Cricket cleanup list that automatically updates weekly to show all articles covered by this project which are marked with cleanup tags. (also available in one big list and in CSV format)
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's sport (and women in sports), a WikiProject which aims to improve coverage of women in sports on Wikipedia. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Women's sportWikipedia:WikiProject Women's sportTemplate:WikiProject Women's sportWomen's sport
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Comment: Ideally, this hook should be published between 1 and 15 May, when the subject will be playing in the Fairbreak Invitational 2022 Women’s T20 Cricket tournament in Dubai (not (yet) mentioned in the article).
@Bahnfrend: New enough and long enough. QPQ present. Looks good from a reference standpoint. But I'm really not sure about this hook. From reading the obstructing the field article, this is clearly a very rare event. Our readers that understand cricket will understand why this would have, ahem, sparked a row. But this isn't very obvious to me. Is there a way to reword this in a way that might make it more accessible to readers that don't know the sport and provide some context? Perhaps... Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 06:44, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Sammi Brie: Thanks for your review. Sorry about the slow response. Yes, obstructing the field is very rare, especially in international matches. I suggest the following further modified hook:
I would be fine with this. I think "accused" captures this well. I still prefer ALT0a myself, but the promoter can choose 0a or 0b. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 06:30, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
.svg)
.JPG)
I notice that this nomination is more than three weeks old, but the QPQ requirement is not complete. Please remember that a QPQ should be completed within a week of the nomination, as per RfC on excessively late supply of QPQ credits. Please do a QPQ promptly. Flibirigit (talk) 16:51, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
Thank you. A full DYK review is still needed. Flibirigit (talk) 14:38, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
@Bahnfrend: New enough and long enough. QPQ present. Looks good from a reference standpoint. But I'm really not sure about this hook. From reading the obstructing the field article, this is clearly a very rare event. Our readers that understand cricket will understand why this would have, ahem, sparked a row. But this isn't very obvious to me. Is there a way to reword this in a way that might make it more accessible to readers that don't know the sport and provide some context? Perhaps... Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 06:44, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
I would be fine with this. I think "accused" captures this well. I still prefer ALT0a myself, but the promoter can choose 0a or 0b. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 06:30, 30 May 2022 (UTC)