Talk:Divisia monetary aggregates index

Business Low‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Statistics Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Statistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of statistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.StatisticsWikipedia:WikiProject StatisticsTemplate:WikiProject StatisticsStatistics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Untitled

Why unfortunately?--Samnikal 13:29, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

separate entry for Divisia index

Econterms (talk) 18:38, 16 December 2008 (UTC) Divisia index redirects to this page, Divisia monetary aggregates. I think Divisia index should have a separate entry, because the Divisia concept/technique is used for physical quantity indexes and price indexes as well as indexes of different types of money. The new entry would draw text from this entry, and also from some research I am doing into the formal economics literature. This entry itself doesn't need to change much except to cite the existence of the new entry, which would define an underlying concept. I am drafting the background to the new text at http://econterms.net/econwiki/index.php?title=Divisia_index and would welcome teammates, especially if they know a lot about this topic or they know French and have access to the original works of Divisia. It's not clear anybody would object to this proposed change but feel free to speak up and participate.[reply]

Done; see Divisia index. It was difficult. Further input is welcome. Econterms (talk) 18:54, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

1. Elaborate possible importance, 2. Link to from "Money Supply" page

I'm very happy there is a wiki page on this!

Two suggestions: 1. It could use a couple sentences on the importance: traditional monetary aggregates fail, and these are designed to work. 2. Relatedly, perhaps there should be a link to this page from the "Money Supply" page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Money_supply (I made this suggestion in that page's talk; I just joined wiki so am getting used to it, but will attempt these when I feel more comfortable.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dvorak oneday (talk • contribs) 23:28, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Divisia monetary aggregates index. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:07, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]