Talk:Diverticulum
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Diverticulum.
|
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
[edit]This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 8 July 2019 and 3 August 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Tkguv. Peer reviewers: Carolyngeraci.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 19:37, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Proposed work plan for updating the Diverticulum page
[edit]Hi everyone I'm participating in the Osmosis Wikipedia editing course and would like to improve this article in the following ways:
1- Adding citations, this article has very few citations.
2- Moving the embryological section above the human pathology section so there is a flow from physiological to pathological.
3-Removing the "Anatomical" part as it seems out of place, and is a throwaway sentence. (please let me know if it's valuable and shouldn't be removed for some reason.)
4-Reformatting and possibly some editing of the "Human Pathology" section - depending on findings from collecting citations.
Comments and suggestions are welcome :) Tkguv (talk) 12:08, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
After looking at featured articles on the WikiProject: Anatomy, thinking of changing the "Human Pathology" section to : "Clinical Significance". — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tkguv (talk • contribs) 15:38, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
- Hey Tkguv,
Introduction looks good! Nice summary and clears up any potential confusion between types of diverticula and normal vs pathologic. I might suggest including a few common types of diverticula in the intro (GI tract diverticula, mainly, since they are fairly common).
Classification and embryology sections make sense and are well-cited.
I agree with the use of bullet points when the information is a list (such as the embryological section). However, some of the bulleted lists might make more sense in paragraph form (such as the GI tract diverticula)
Maybe include a link to diverticulitis or diverticulosis at some point?
Carolyngeraci (talk) 01:30, 29 July 2019 (UTC)carolyngeraci