Talk:Diveagar

India: Maharashtra / Geography Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Maharashtra (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian geography workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article was last assessed in May 2012.

Redirect

This page is about Place known as Diveagar which has a great beach Mandar 24 (talk) 00:48, 20 January 2009‎ (UTC)[reply]

Moved the Diveagar_Beach to Diveagar. If a separate article on Diveagar beach is required, then please create it.Redr (talk) 05:49, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Shrivardhan

It is relevant that the town of Shrivardhan in nearby to Diveagar Beach. The fact that The renowned Peshwa Balaji Vishwanath was born in Shrivardhan and was later decorated as the first Peshwa by the Sahu Maharaj. may be relevant to Shrivardhan, but that fact is not particularly relevant to Diveagar Beach, unless there is more to that story that ties the Peshwas to Diveagar Beach which would require a source, and a citation thereto. --Bejnar (talk) 01:39, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Suvarna Ganesh Temple

The story about the Suvarna Ganesh Temple containing a Ganapati idol weighing 1 Kg and 325 grams and its theft in 2011, and its replacement with a new idol is an interesting story, but there is no verification from a reliable source. Nor has anyone provided a reliable source for the fact that Mrs. Patil discovered the idol buried on her betel nut farm in a thick copper chest with other treasure. Please do not restore these stories to the article unless you can provide citation to one or more reliable sources. --Bejnar (talk) 04:00, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Given that the idol was found along with the copper plate inscription in Modi script, it has some value with respect to the history of the region. There are many news reports regarding the discovery of Ganesh idol and its theft. e.g. http://72.78.249.187/SakaalTimesBeta/20120324/5722850581095233272.htm and http://www.indianexpress.com/news/diveagar-temple-gets-goldplated-ganesh-idol/944716 Are news reports considered as reliable sources? Redr (talk) 05:36, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, generally news stories from established newspapers are considered reliable. I don't know about the Sakaal Times, but the Indian Express is an established paper. You can ask about them at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. It would be better if you could find an academic source. --Bejnar (talk) 04:02, 27 February 2013

This is supposedly a part of doctoral thesis. This should have more credibility. It mentions about Golden Ganesh temple and Roop Narayan, Sundar Narayan temple. This Indian Express news article has covered more details. Can you include those? Redr (talk) 15:18, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Diveagar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130329052940/http://www.konkanyatra.com/diveagar/places.html to http://www.konkanyatra.com/diveagar/places.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:12, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]