Talk:Distributed object communication

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Distributed object communication article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Distributed object communication. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080222033010/http://www.oreilly.com:80/catalog/javadc/chapter/ch03.html to http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/javadc/chapter/ch03.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:16, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

I propose that Object_request_broker and Distributed_object be merged into Distributed_object_communication. The subjects are clearly overlapping, but not even connected by links. The individual articles are a bit thin too. 2001:700:1200:5118:A427:FCE2:30DD:5DBE (talk) 09:46, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I could go either way on this. I did, however, remove the second drive-by merge proposal at distributed object with target merge object request broker, which strikes me as in no way serious, while the possibility remains to merge here, instead. — MaxEnt 09:31, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Given that there's still no clear support for this, and opposition for parts of the proposal, I'll close it, but have added links through the 'see also' and elsewhere in order to ensure that the pages are linked. Klbrain (talk) 08:45, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]