Jump to content

Talk:Dismissal of U.S. attorneys controversy timeline

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Bias

[edit]
  • Why does this timeline primarily document the firings by the two most recent Republican presidents, yet largely ignore those by Democrats? This custom began when Jimmy Carter came to office and he cleaned house, continued under Ronald Reagan, George Bush Sr., peaked under Bill Clinton, and continued under Barack Obama. This article portrays a very biased account. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.215.171.98 (talk) 00:09, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

To do list

[edit]
  • Washinton Post list of names at times to be added
    Need to add the names from this timeline Graphic Timeline May 17, 2007.
  • Replace cites to Yahoo with same AP or wire service articles published elswhere
    Yahoo times out repidly, but the wire service articles are widely published. Check also Breitbart.com AP wire item. -- Yellowdesk
  • Check if all cites to other timeline articles can cite back to the original sources
    These other timelines cite original published sources. This article should too: check cites to U.S. News & World Report, TPM, Washington Post. -- Yellowdesk
  • Check citations to blogs, follow their cited sources
    Gonzaleswatch and Talking Points Memo, among others. -- Yellowdesk

Include Years in months headers

[edit]

It will aid the future edit summaries, and help keep the editors organized (and perhaps help readers) to put the year with every month. Objections? -- Yellowdesk 21:50, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

None from me. Go ahead and do it. Remember 22:26, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Yellowdesk

Todd Graves

[edit]

Wow, great work on this page, guys. I noticed that you didn't metion the firing of Todd Graves in March 2006. I know that dismissal became an issue only recently, so it's not totally clear where it fits in, but I just wanted to see if that omission was intentional, or if you planned on including him (perhaps you are waiting for a secondary source timeline that includes him?) -RustavoTalk/Contribs 18:43, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No intention; just an oversight. Feel free to add it. It's just hard to keep track of everything. Remember 22:04, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The tense of the sentences

[edit]

I note an inconsistency in the tense of the entries, e.g. "February 2006 - so-and-so does this" vs. "February 2006 - so-and-so did this". Suggest these all be consistent, but not sure which way to go (recommend the least labor approach...). Bdushaw 19:40, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

:For the long run, the simple past is best. Jim ran, Bob said, Joe resigned. Monica met. Alberto denied. -- Yellowdesk 20:26, 27 May 2007 (UTC) [reply]
I take it back. Let's leave them alone until we need to have uniformity. the "Past continuing" tense using the present tense seems to work just fine. -- Yellowdesk 19:39, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sources to consider incorporating into timeline

[edit]

Articles

[edit]
Hiring Practices
[edit]
  • Immigration Judgets not qualified: LA times, May 26, 2007 judges lack apt backgrounds -- (Yellowdesk 19:41, 29 May 2007 (UTC))[reply]
  • Washington Post Dan Eggen, March 26, 2007 Officials Say Justice Dept. Based Hires on Politics Before Goodling Tenure, Page A02
  • Isikoff, Michael (June 4, 2007). ["Bush's Monica Problem: Gonzales, the president's lawyer and Texas buddy, is twisting slowly in the wind, facing a vote of no confidence from the Senate". Newsweek. The Washington Post Company. Retrieved 2007-05-29. {{cite news}}: Check |url= value (help); Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  • Goldstein, Amy (June 11, 2007). "Immigration Judges Often Picked Based On GOP Ties: Law Forbids Practice; Courts Being Reshaped". Washington Post. pp. A1. Retrieved 2007-06-11. {{cite news}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
Gonzales
[edit]
Short article: Re: Daniel J. Metcalfe, the former director of the Justice Department’s Office of Information and Privacy, Quote: Metcalfe "said he resigned in January because he could no longer tolerate the “sheer political expediency, avoidance of individual responsibility, defensive personal aggrandizement, irresponsible ‘consensus’ decisionmaking (and) disregard for longstanding practices and principles."
Longer interview and article with Metcalfe.
  • http://newsinfo.iu.edu/tips/page/normal/6243.html Tipsheet "The resignation of Attorney General Alberto Gonzales" Aug. 28, 2007 Publisher University of Indiana
    Comments by
    Craig Bradley, Robert A. Lucas Professor of Law
    Fred H. Cate, distinguished professor and director, Center for Applied Cybersecurity Research
    Dawn Johnsen, professor of law and Ira C. Batman faculty fellow

Documents

[edit]

Members Congress

[edit]

Bibliographies and Databases

[edit]

Media Matters:

Search on fired attorneys Media Matters critique of coverage. Relevant. About fifty items on 3+ pages.
Search on Goodling Media Matters Goodling
Search on McNulty Media Matters McNulty
and so on

Sourcewatch

Access to a chronological bibliography of sources

Think Progress

http://thinkprogress.org/ Often has citations/sources to major media articles

Other

[edit]

Chronology to keep up with (add to-do items as needed)

[edit]
  • Hearings June 7 2007 on elections laws
  • June 7, 8 or 9 ,2007 Hearings of the Senate Judiciary Committee/ subcommittee on Constitution on secret wiretapping programs. Info on the consensus or lack therof in DOJ and Whitehouse
  • Followup on Schlozman hearings
  • Followup on Gonzales vote of confidence June 11, 2007
  • June 5 or 6 Documents release. Not clearly accessible via Senate web page. Only Talking Points Memo seems to have.
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Dismissal of U.S. attorneys controversy timeline. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:05, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Dismissal of U.S. attorneys controversy timeline. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 12:49, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 16 external links on Dismissal of U.S. attorneys controversy timeline. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:52, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 14 external links on Dismissal of U.S. attorneys controversy timeline. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:34, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 25 external links on Dismissal of U.S. attorneys controversy timeline. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:08, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Dismissal_of_U.S._attorneys_controversy_timeline&oldid=1201558595"