Jump to content

Talk:Discount Tire

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Attempt at salvaging

[edit]

This article was in pretty macabre shape, Halle would be rolling in his grave. I've tried overhauling it to the best my ability as a first-time editor. Parts are still funky or outdated. If anyone is interested, there are official SVG logos for both the Discount Tire and America's Tire brands. The actual parent corporation has no logo.

Neutrality and reliable sourcing is a little hard, especially considering the mostly quiet and consistent history of the company. There were lawsuits worth mentioning, however, such as the ones regarding tire recalls and usage of the "Discount Tire" name. 76.187.192.58 (talk) 06:39, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promotional page

[edit]

This is about the most promotional article I have seen on Wikipedia. It is just about pure advertising, and a corruption of the purpose of Wikipedia. Expect a visit from admins soon, who will probably suggest you either quote a LOT of sources to justify your glowing claims or delete the article altogether. See WP:AfD Rumiton 10:08, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Revision on 22:31, 21 August 2007 by User:Mr.Z-man reverted article to the last non-advert version—CZmarlin 17:37, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I am writing this letter in regards to the deletion of Discount Tire's wikipedia article today and the comment you made back in July. I would like to know why you think this article was deleted. There wasn't to much detail given except for blatant advertising. I, of course, want to meet Wikipedia's standards and I just want to know what sections of the article were more of an advertisement then factual information. If you can provide the answer to this question it would be very much appreciated. The last thing I want to do is make the same mistakes when I decide to post a new article for Discount Tire. Thank you very much!! Jlsathomas 15:27, 22 August 2007
I posted this answer on my Talk Page but perhaps it wasn't seen. Here it is again.
Hello. The main requirement, as you say, is that Wiki articles show a neutral point of view (NPOV.) This means that only concrete statements are allowed, not emotional statements, and even concrete facts need references to "respected sources" to be unchallengeable. "Primary sources" ie the company itself, are generally not acceptable; you have to quote what some other source, eg a trade magazine, government research office or scholar, wrote about the subject. (I suspect that the main problem with your article was that sourced and unsourced statements were interwoven in a way that might make untangling them unfeasible.)
For example when you write "Discount Tire Company is the world's largest independent tire and wheel retailer," that is a fact that can be independently sourced, provided that words like independent and retailer don't provide problems. (They might.) You would need to find a reputable source that says exactly what you have written. But when you write "His philosophy has remained consistent..." you are getting into the emotional and unprovable areas. If an independent source could be found who says something like "According to the ITC Terms of Employment, 1960, employees were expected to... and in 2007 the same terms were applied, reflecting a continuity of standards" you could use the statement. Otherwise it is unprovable. The Wiki term for this is cruft or even worse, spam. Even neutral sentences that refer perhaps to the size of the company need supporting references, again preferably not from primary sources.
Phrases like "offering them service that reflects the skill and knowledge of our employees" are not only unprovable, but essentially meaningless, as are assertions like "Discount Tire Company has a vision that not only lives, but thrives, in the hearts of its employees, each and every day."
When you say "Building customer relationships has allowed Discount Tire to become a leader in the industry" who says so? Someone else might claim the company got ahead by pork barrelling or uncompetitive practises (I live in Australia and know nothing about the company, I am just pointing out what can be alleged.)
"Its continual growth not only provides greater opportunities for employee advancement, but allows even more customers to remain confident when choosing Discount Tire for all of their tire and wheel needs." Do I need to go on? This is advertising, not encyclopedic research.
One thing to consider when writing is "How might a competitor or a disgruntled ex-employee respond to this article?" Remember they will have the same editing rights that you have. If you write with meticulous neutrality and respect for sources you might, among other things, save yourself a time-consuming and harrowing edit war down the line.
Good luck with future attempts. Rumiton 13:23, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Rumiton 06:14, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Discount Tire donates $1 million to anti-marijuana campaign against Prop 205. Boycott calls

[edit]

Here is info and a reference in case anybody wants to develop this more in the article.

"Discount Tire Co. quietly donated $1 million to the campaign opposing the legalization of marijuana for recreational use, prompting calls for a boycott by some who want the drug legal through Proposition 205. ... Prop. 205 asks Arizona voters to decide whether marijuana should be legal for adults to use in private, transport and grow it in their homes. The measure would create a retail system in Arizona that would be regulated and taxed by the state. The measure creates more lenient penalties for most marijuana violations. Discount Tire's donation, posted on the Secretary of State's website, is the No on Prop. 205's largest."

--Timeshifter (talk) 20:59, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Discount Tire. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:59, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Installing tires and balancing

[edit]

Your store in greenville nc at the corner of hooker road and greenville boulevard is ran by and assisted manager named Braxton is unprofessional worst attitude of any person supposing to be a manager as I have seen letting inexperienced workers tear up people's cars installing tires unsupervised is unacceptable at the highest level I would never recommend your company to anyone fmoore0306@gmail.com 75.110.61.34 (talk) 11:12, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Discount_Tire&oldid=1206982058"