Talk:Disc film

Discussion

Is there room for a comment about the reliability of the cameras? All of the Disc cameras I ever owned (all Kodak) died horribly with the motor running out of control, but I don't know if there was a general problem with that or not. Haikupoet 02:11, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that part of the appeal of the format is it permitted the shutter release to be in front of the camera, rather than on top of it. Kodak engineers had discovered that a large share of the prints developed showed vertical camera movement - not surprising for light consumer cameras with slow shutter speeds. Placing the shutter button in front permitted the camera movement to have less effect on the final print. Measure for Measure (talk) 19:51, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Introducing a new format also helped Kodak fight off competitive pressures from Fujifilm. Personally, I thought at the time that the 110 format made more sense for casual consumers, notwithstanding the shutter button placement issues. Reminiscences by a Kodak engineer in the comments here: http://gadgets.boingboing.net/2008/03/31/bad-old-days-kodak-d.html Measure for Measure (talk) 19:51, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sure it was introduced in 1982? I could have sworn the one I received was on my 7th birthday, in July 1981. Stephanie Booth —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.218.95.180 (talk) 09:28, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

scan

How to make for scan the discs? Thank you for your answer. Hubert DhonteDhonte (talk) 13:55, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

1st

Was this system the first negatives on disc technology in photography?

This is a 1965 negatives on disc?

https://scontent-lhr3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xpf1/v/t1.0-9/12009659_1014816621914628_4696639617571813470_n.jpg?oh=eccc00ee5334ec3d9fe72f76409d7dd7&oe=56A1BBD6

EDLIS Café 21:30, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Disc film. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150131002358/http://www.museumoftechnology.org.uk/expand.php?key=1139 to http://www.museumoftechnology.org.uk/expand.php?key=1139

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:35, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]