Talk:Disappearance of Kristen Modafferi

This article was nominated for deletion on 7 April 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was Rework and move to National Center for Missing Adults..

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

File:Kristen Modafferi.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Kristen Modafferi.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Kristen Modafferi.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 09:58, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on National Center for Missing Adults. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:38, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

noticed a strange edit in the article

This anonymous edit on Dec 5 2020:

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Disappearance_of_Kristen_Modafferi&type=revision&diff=992445645&oldid=990873953

"Another theory is she casually met another student photographer and went to her house in Oakland to talk about photography. At that point, the photo session didn't go as planned and something happened leading to her untimely death and the other photographer may still have details about the occurrence but knows what happened was more of a self-defense situation. However, that's mere speculation."

This is a strange thing to add. Whose theory is this? Seems like the invention of the anonymous wikipedia editor who added it, but the wording implies that it is a theory with some established traction in actual discourse. If it does have traction then the passage should acknowledge who is discussing this theory, preferably with citations.

Tone is also a little unprofessional.

(and is it just me, or is the edit kinda fishy?) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.134.146.154 (talk) 03:21, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]