Talk:Disadvantage

Where in the organization of the article does the concept of "double-turning" best belong? - 75.17.149.251 (talk) 23:09, 16 December 2007 (UTC) 123 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.92.119.124 (talk) 08:57, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know if this is the best solution, but I created a brief overview of the "turns" section and added a definition of double-turning there. Anerdw (talk) 05:27, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Some uncorrected vandalism still remains on this page

This article was vandalized in July 2014. I tried to undo this section blanking, but I was unable to make this change because of conflicting intermediate edits. Jarble (talk) 20:42, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Best practice regarding sources here?

This page doesn't have very many sources, but most of the articles written about DAs are blogs written by debaters, former debaters, and debate coaches. Do you think the evil of blog posts outweighs the evil of unsourced articles in this case? Anerdw (talk) 02:17, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]