Jump to content

Talk:Dirty Girl (2010 film)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an interesting movie

[edit]

It cost $4 million to make but made nothing it, I wonder who lost out? It is a ok movie, it just needed better cinematography to give it that movie standard look, like using Panavision lens for example. I think it has a good story line and acting is so so but I still admire the film. It would be nice to know the break down on how much the actors got and what it actually cost to produce the movie without actor salaries as actors cost too much depending on who they are.--83.167.240.232 (talk) 22:59, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Dirty Girl (2010 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:28, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]