Talk:Dirty Dancer

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Dirty Dancer appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 22 May 2011 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that "Dirty Dancer", a song by Enrique Iglesias, Usher and Lil Wayne, was performed by Iglesias on American Idol on May 12, 2011?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2011/May.

Wikipedia

Versus

I believe that DD was released to promote Versus/RvR deluxe because the single clearly credits "Enrique Iglesias with Usher featuring Lil Wayne". If it were not a single by Usher as a lead artist, it would be "Enrique Iglesias featuring Usher and Lil Wayne". If the labels go to such lengths to stipulate Usher's lead artist-ness, would that not signify promotion of his album(s)? Adabow (talk · contribs) 23:52, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect... this is the same issue as "Check It Out (song)" which is accredited equally to Nicki Minaj and will.i.am. Listing an artist using the word 'with' instead of 'featuring' makes very little difference. It is WP:Synthesis to assume that the word 'with' implies that it must be promoting Usher's album too. The fact is both artists are on a different record labels and from what I can see in the sources, only Universal is listed as a label for "Dirty Dancer," universal is Enrique's label while Usher is signed to Sony - a rival company. One label will not bear the cost of promoting a single for an artist on a different record label. — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 23:56, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I suppose that makes sense... Adabow (talk · contribs) 00:01, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Now if a source was to come across implicitly stating otherwise then I'll accept the change. — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 00:12, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It does seem a little odd to me, though, that they make two separate distinctions; 'with' and 'featuring'? but I tried to slightly improve the LEAD to correspond with the discussion here.—Iknow23 (talk) 22:15, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It is still a single by Usher, although it was not released to promote Versus (what the discussion is about). Adabow (talk · contribs) 04:40, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Other songs

Dirty Dancer (Kingsland Road song) not released yet also redirect Dirty Dancer (The Bar Kays song). In ictu oculi (talk) 00:55, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Dirty Dancer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ariacharts.com.au/pages/charts_display_dance.asp?chart=1D20
Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/query?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ifpicr.cz%2Fhitparadask%2Findex.php%3Fhitp%3DR&date=2011-10-02 to http://www.ifpicr.cz/hitparadask/index.php?hitp=R
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ariacharts.com.au/pages/charts_display_dance.asp?chart=1D20
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.allaccess.com/top40-mainstream/future-releases
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.universal-music.de/musik/enrique/detail/product/176814/dirty-dancer-2-track/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:21, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 30 August 2017

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved DrStrauss talk 17:46, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

– I have been recently looking for this song on so many music platforms, Apple Music/iTunes, Spotify, Napster, you name it, and I cannot find the remix single anymore. I can still find the version on Enrique's album with just Usher, but I cannot find the remix with Lil Wayne, and the remix was the official single version. So between a song that is no longer available for purchase/streaming and a song by a group from X Factor that failed to make the top 40, I find neither song superior over the other. In other words, neither is the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. JE98 (talk) 17:07, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. The Iglesias/Usher song clearly has greater long-term significance over a song that charted at #85 in a single country. Chase (talk | contributions) 16:18, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Despite being older, the Iglesias song receives *96%* of the page traffic.[1] It's clearly the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC.--Cúchullain ^t/c 17:05, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.