Jump to content

Talk:Dirrty

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleDirrty has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 17, 2007Good article nomineeListed
August 5, 2009Good article reassessmentKept
August 14, 2013Good article reassessmentDelisted
April 20, 2016Peer reviewReviewed
July 5, 2016Good article nomineeListed
Current status: Good article

This makes very little sense

[edit]

As she wanted to make the song "dirrtier" than it would have been, she explained in interviews that as result, she added an extra "r" to the title to make it "Dirrty" instead of the correct "Dirty".

Huh? 86.132.139.17 03:42, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Single in Indonesia?

[edit]

I wonder how come in the list of the chart there's "Indonesia Chart" ? who enter that data? there's no cd-single sold in indonesia.. there are only albums.. I'm live in indonesia so i know that no one sells cd single here.. Please fix that data or at least give an information where did the data taken from.

It's not true, and if you really think there's no such thing like that in your country I suggest you remove it.--HW-Barnstar PLS 15:04, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I'm pretty sure there is an Indonesian Singles Chart. Regardless, Indonesia is not a major music market, so it shouldn't be in the table, even if it can be referenced. ShadowHalo 02:16, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
isn't the indonesian chart digital sales/radio play based?Sennen goroshi 08:02, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA Nom

[edit]

Good work on an often-overlooked genre on this site: pop music. I found a few things that need fixing, and I made a few recommendations. They're mostly minor, so I'm going to go ahead and pass this article.

  • Introduce Rockwilder as a producer in the first sentence of the body.
  • Wikilink hip pop in the second paragraph of the body.
  • I would recommend mentioning where the song was recorded.
  • "The video generated some controversy and changed the public's perception of Aguilera" - It's probably too bold to say that it changed the public's peception
  • I'm not sure that you need the charts at the bottom, since the important peaks are already mentioned in the article or the infobox template. Also, you might want to just insert the "Credits and personnel" as prose into the first section.
  • There's a few MOS problems in the citations. Stripped needs to be italicized in many of them, and a few (15, 16, 19, 25) have prepositions capitalized.

Teemu08 06:19, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I'll see if I can implement some of those suggestions. Regarding the citations though, I think the emphasis/capitalization is supposed to remain unchanged from how it originally appears at the source. ShadowHalo 06:26, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Table Dancing

[edit]

Whether table dancing is erotic or not, it certainly is not a sexual activity. —Preceding unsigned comment added by ThisIsMyName (talkcontribs) 09:01, July 5, 2007 (UTC)

The article to which you linked disagrees. "Some people engage in various sexual activities as a business transaction…aspects of the adult industry include (for example) telephone sex operators, strip clubs, erotic dancers, pornography and the like." Sexual activities are not limited to only sexual intercourse. ShadowHalo 09:01, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I understand that sexual activities aren't limited to sexual intercourse. What I don't understand is how dancing on a table, whether it be at a nightclub, bar, or at your own home, means it's a sexual activity. The term erotic dance can easily be consider an sexual activity, because it meant to incite arousal or sexual thoughts.ThisIsMyName 09:52, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Dancing on a table in itself would not necessarily be sexual. However, the point of "table dancing and sweating [one's] clothes off", as worded in the reference, is clearly sexual. Table dancing isn't supposed to be just getting on a table and dancing; it's done to titillate. ShadowHalo 16:45, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Christina's masturbatory action in the Dirrty video doesn't necessarily reference "male masturbation" - it's what girls do... and she is talking about what it takes to "get her off". Or do you all assume that women don't masturbate? I would like to correct it in the main page, but don't want to get into a fight! Wikipedalo (talk) 22:28, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Since Allmusic have changed the syntax of their URLs, 1 link(s) used in the article do not work anymore and can't be migrated automatically. Please use the search option on http://www.allmusic.com to find the new location of the linked Allmusic article(s) and fix the link(s) accordingly, prefereably by using the {{Allmusic}} template. If a new location cannot be found, the link(s) should be removed. This applies to the following external links:

--CactusBot (talk) 10:00, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

rollback of peacocking

[edit]

Any further edits to this page that are non-constructive in nature and only serve to talk up this subject should be removed and the article forwarded for protection. most such edits are from unregistered IP users. --RichardMills65 (talk) 15:56, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dyads

[edit]

The dyads in the chorus and the rap-verse isn´t a Bb-dyad, it´s more lika a G-minor dyad. The notes are D and G, a perfect fourth. There´s an effect on it so it kinda "slides" in on the D, but there´s no doubt it´s a D.

30.10.2012

Edit request 3 January 2013

[edit]

copied from User talk:Raykyogrou0:
Please change the line "on her last world tour" into "on her latest world tour". — Preceding unsigned comment added by Raykyogrou0 (talkcontribs) 3 January 2013

I'm not going to disagree with this, as "last world tour" slightly implies that there is no possibility of another world tour (e.g., if the person is deceased or permanently retired from performing). If no one objects in 24 hours I'll go ahead and change it. I have no prejudice against any other autoconfirmed editor in good standing making the edit before that time period. —KuyaBriBriTalk 17:54, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see any problem, and it's been more than 24 hours since you said that, so I'll go ahead and change it. - a boat that can float! (watch me float) 04:32, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Done - a boat that can float! (watch me float) 04:36, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I Will Be

[edit]

Can somebody please insert the authors of the B-side I Will Be? I think it could be useful to many. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.34.47.92 (talk) 12:48, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The track's key is wrong it should be B flat major (or G minor) not B flat minor.

[edit]

The original reference is correct it is just some one has either made a mistake in working out the key from the song's sheet music or mistakenly wrote minor instead of major. 2.31.188.237 (talk) 12:44, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Dirrty. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:26, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 9 external links on Dirrty. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:11, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 9 external links on Dirrty. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:02, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]