Jump to content

Talk:Dion Donohue

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dion Donohue. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:17, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Criminal record

[edit]

Donohue's criminal record for assaulting a woman has been removed by an IP address near Portsmouth and a user whose name refers to a Portsmouth player. This may breach conflict of interest - being unable to write factually about a subject because of emotional attachment. The former ridiculously said the source was unreliable, the latter removed it without a summary. The Daily Post is a reliable local source and if they had written a false story seven years ago they would have faced consequences by now. 147.143.128.202 (talk) 13:16, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I would certainly agree on the Daily Post, there's no reason to doubt the reliability of the site whatsoever. Kosack (talk) 13:21, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]