Talk:Diobol

Obolus, diobolus triobolus

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result was merge into Obolus. -- Fuzzygenius (talk) 22:21, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think it might make more sense to treat the diobol and triobol under subheads within the article "Obous." It might be more convenient for readers, and less repetitious in explaining value, etc. Cynwolfe (talk) 13:52, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. I agree —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.217.35.75 (talk) 03:01, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I also agree. Considering the time this has spent with its merge tag, and the lack of any negative responses, I'm doing the merge. - Fuzzygenius (talk) 22:21, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.