Dinogad's Smock (final version) received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which on 19 January 2022 was archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wales on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WalesWikipedia:WikiProject WalesTemplate:WikiProject WalesWales articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poetry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of poetry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoetryWikipedia:WikiProject PoetryTemplate:WikiProject PoetryPoetry articles
I'm a little worried about the notability of Ffynnon's recording of the song, it is cited in their own website, which I don't think provides enough notability to add it to the article. Is there perhaps an independent Welsh language source which mentions this recording? That would be enough to guarantee inclusion. --Boynamedsue (talk) 16:38, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Even with the BBC review, I'm not convinced that the band warrant mention. They certainly wouldn't pass the guidelines for having their own WP page per NBAND. Unless anyone can come up with anything substantial, I'm minded to boldly delete the paragraph. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 17:42, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I think it probably just passes WP:WEIGHT. It isn't enough to show notability for an article about Ffynnon, but it's a review in an RS which talks about the song. I think that's enough for inclusion. If you feel strongly, we could amicably go to third opinion. I would be happy to abide by the decision of the user providing the third opinion. Boynamedsue (talk) 20:35, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
