Talk:Dinesh Karthik/GA1
Appearance
GA Reassessment
[edit]This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. In all a very good article. The article history has been updated to reflect this review. Regards, Jackyd101 (talk) 09:19, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- Only one slight comment here, which is that a new heading may be appropriate after Recall, as the text continues onto other subjects and takes up most of the article unbroken. Try adding a new heading in at some pointto break this up.--Jackyd101 (talk) 09:26, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
- It is stable.
- It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
- a (tagged and captioned): b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- a Pass/Fail: