Talk:Dinas Dinlle

Environment Mid‑importance

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wales Low‑importance

	Wales portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wales on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WalesWikipedia:WikiProject WalesTemplate:WikiProject WalesWales articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Fortifications / British / European

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Fortifications task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dinas Dinlle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927171940/http://www.gtj.org.uk/en/item1/1234 to http://www.gtj.org.uk/en/item1/1234

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:12, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dinas Dinlle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928061516/http://www.coflein.gov.uk/pls/portal/coflein.w_details?inumlink=6002653 to http://www.coflein.gov.uk/pls/portal/coflein.w_details?inumlink=6002653

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:50, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Aerial view of Dinas Dinlle Iron Age Hill Fort.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:57, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Aerial view of Dinas Dinlle Iron Age Hill Fort.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:23, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edit war

The Banner, what was wrong with the IP's edits? Are they a sockpuppet or LTA? Is it subtle vandalism? Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 19:21, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In essence: cutting out history, cutting out the gallery and other non-neutral edits. IP thinks that galleries are superfluous and (s)he removed them multiple times on multiple articles. And I skip the personal attacks used as explanation for his unsourced and unexplained edits. The Banner talk 23:44, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Since the initial edit did not appear vandalistic, it would have helped to leave an explanatory edit summary while reverting. Many of the copyedits seem helpful. Do you object to all of them? Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 15:11, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Look for the context of his actions here and review the edits from August 2023. The Banner talk 17:23, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

None of that looks like vandalism, and you inaccurately labeled one edit vandalism when reverting. Please follow-up on incivility through conduct dispute venues, not by reverting without explanation. Edit warring with good-faith contributors, even ones who are being uncivil, is not helpful. As you say, now the IP is socking, so revert away. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 17:49, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good luck with enabling this person in his behaviour. The Banner talk 23:26, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And by now, the editor behind the IP has used a second IP, so is now an sockpuppeteer. The Banner talk 17:39, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]