Talk:Dilruba

India: Music Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian music workgroup (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article was last assessed in March 2012.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 19:32, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 26 February 2019

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved per WP:COMMON. (non-admin closure) samee converse 16:18, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dilrupa → Dilruba – 20,200 Google search results for Dilrupa vs. 26,50,000 for Dilruba. Kailash29792 (talk) 09:00, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

wth is this?

"Examining the sources in the prior sentences, an attempt has been made, but they have not provided any valid historical connection of the dilruba to the court of Guru Gobind Singh"

This doesn't belong in the article. Since this wasn't first discussed in the Talk page, I think this should be considered vandalism. I'll remove it if I don't get a response to this.

KropotkinSchmopotkin (talk) 14:09, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I too was surprised by this sentence, as a dilruba player that is the story that I was told. However I did some research and on page 226 of this research thesis https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/handle/2027.42/107325 the same claims are made. Seeing as how that's the only reference I could find, I suggest re-wording the addition to say that there is some doubt as to the truth of the previous claims and adding the citation as necessary. --Autumn astronomer (talk) 23:44, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As this was not addressed, I edited the article to reflect the more neutral viewpoint. Autumn astronomer (talk) 21:36, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

4 bowed strings?

I have never seen any string but the first played on the dilruba, so the claim of 4 bowed strings in the construction section should have a citation.

--Autumn astronomer (talk) 23:44, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As this was not addressed, I edited the article to reflect it. Autumn astronomer (talk) 20:44, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]