Talk:Dilophosauridae

Dinosaurs Mid‑importance

	Dinosaurs portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Dinosaurs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of dinosaurs and dinosaur-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DinosaursWikipedia:WikiProject DinosaursTemplate:WikiProject Dinosaursdinosaurs articles
Mid	This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Palaeontology Low‑importance

	Paleontology portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Safurukawa.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 19:32, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Earliest large theropods

If I am not mistaken, the dilophosaurids were some of the earliest large-sized theropods to evolve. Should that have mention? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dinolover45 (talk • contribs) 18:08, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The questionable existence of this page.

Should this page really even exist? Some paleontologists recently have placed at least two of the family's members, Cryolophosaurus ellioti and Sinosaurus triassicus into the clade Tetanurae. If this is the case, why should we have a page for a family of dinosaurs that is paraphyletic (that is, they do not share a common ancestor)? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Megalosauroid (talk • contribs) 02:34, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The answer is that it shouldn't exist, it should be merged with Neotheropoda due to Dilophosaurus' recent description being the final nail in the coffin Sauriazoicillus (talk) 05:50, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Sauriazoicillus: Feel free to implement Hemiauchenia (talk) 08:43, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Hemiauchenia: So do I need to do anything to merge articles? Is there any form of thing I need to go through or things I need to sign? Sorry I'm very new to this. Sauriazoicillus (talk) 12:07, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Sauriazoicillus: See WP:MERGE for instructions. Hemiauchenia (talk) 12:11, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Merging page

This page should be merged into Neotheropoda and listed as paraphyletic as per the description and phylogenetic results of Dilophosaurus material by Marsh, A.D.; Rowe, T.B.(2020)^[1] Sauriazoicillus (talk) 05:46, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

^ Marsh, A.D.;, Rowe, T.B. (2020). ""A comprehensive anatomical and phylogenetic evaluation of Dilophosaurus wetherilli (Dinosauria, Theropoda) with descriptions of new specimens from the Kayenta Formation of northern Arizona"". Journal of Palaeontology. 94 (S78): 1-103. doi:10.1017/jpa.2020.14. Retrieved 30 July 2021.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: extra punctuation (link) CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)

[Description-1] Marsh, A.D.;, Rowe, T.B. (2020). ""A comprehensive anatomical and phylogenetic evaluation of Dilophosaurus wetherilli (Dinosauria, Theropoda) with descriptions of new specimens from the Kayenta Formation of northern Arizona"". Journal of Palaeontology. 94 (S78): 1-103. doi:10.1017/jpa.2020.14. Retrieved 30 July 2021.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: extra punctuation (link) CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)

[1]