Talk:Dil Dhadakne Do/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ssven2 (talk · contribs) 17:09, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I will review this article. Thank you. — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 17:09, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

"Akhtar, an avid observer," — Looks like praise. Best to remove it for neutrality's sake even if Akhtar's an avid observer or not.
"was partly fiction and partly a fictionalised version of people around her," — repetition of "partly" and "fiction/fictionalised" in the same sentence and at close proximity to each other. Do tweak it.

Done.Krish | Talk 13:36, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Aside from a few minor issues which I myself dealt with, the article looks good enough for meeting the GA criteria. Once these comments are addressed, the article is promoted. — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 07:57, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Krish is still active as of yesterday, so I'd leave these to him. But I'd suggest he remove the character names from the plot section to avoid bloating the plot, and overlinking. ----Kailash29792 (talk) 08:48, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks guys Kailash29792 and Ssven2.Krish | Talk 13:36, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. Has an appropriate reference section:

B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
Overall: Passed, my queries were met and solved by the nominator.
Pass or Fail:

Thank you for addressing my comments, Krish!, and congratulations. The article is promoted. — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 13:46, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]