Talk:Dikarya
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
A mould is a mould. A Fungi is a fungi. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Luridiformis (talk • contribs) 15:57, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
This seems like a pretty vacuous article as is. Why is the classification done this way? How could one determine if something in front of them is in this class? Am I way out on a limb here? Themusicgod1 (talk) 04:04, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Dikarya. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070611073022/http://plantbio.berkeley.edu/~taylor/papers/James2006.pdf to http://plantbio.berkeley.edu/~taylor/papers/James2006.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:14, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
Leading image captions are wrong
[edit]There are two images at the top of the article, but their captions are problematic. The first caption lists one less item than are visible in the accompanying collage, and the second caption, while claiming to describe the items in clockwise order, does not (cf., e.g., enumeration of truffle in third place, though it would belong last in the list if in the order in which they appear). I don't know the names of all of the fungi shown, and the original image details lack sufficient information, so I am unable to resolve these issues on my own. Al Begamut (talk) 23:11, 22 June 2024 (UTC)