Talk:Digital security

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Computer Security, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer security on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer SecurityWikipedia:WikiProject Computer SecurityTemplate:WikiProject Computer SecurityComputer Security articles

This redirect is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Things you can help WikiProject Computer Security with:

Article alerts will be generated shortly by AAlertBot. Please allow some days for processing. More information...

Review importance and quality of existing articles
Identify categories related to Computer Security
Tag related articles
Identify articles for creation (see also: Article requests)
Identify articles for improvement
Create the Project Navigation Box including lists of adopted articles, requested articles, reviewed articles, etc.
Find editors who have shown interest in this subject and ask them to take a look here.

Untitled

This reads like an advertisement. Why is this on Wikipedia? Maarx (talk) 15:28, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Digital Security article contains references to some companies and products when they are integral to this discussion of digital security. It mentions initiatives by some of the leading companies, with no loyalties to any. Digital security is a large technology category, and it is expected that many others will contribute to this page. Also, references will be fixed. Medinafly (talk) 21:09, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This article is basically an ad. Or rather, it is a company white paper promoting a particular company. I removed the link to the company. It needs to actually DEFINE "digital security" in its first sentence. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikied (talk • contribs) 20:08, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This 'article' reads like a backpatting festival between various self interested government, private, and nonprofit organizations. there is no cohesive, or even useful information, and the whole thing should probably be removed. if i knew how to nominate it for that, i would. anyway, i've just removed the section claiming that verisign is 'the premier source of security' on the internet. Ascallion (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 17:47, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]