Jump to content

Talk:Digital history

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article does reference http://digitalhistory.unl.edu/ and shares some of the same references but does not share content. Dougseefeldt (talk) 22:01, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Digital History is Cinderella of History as Social History and Economic History had been in 1960s. Presently it has worked on digitization of libraries and archives which is inter disciplinary activity involving Librarians, computer experts and media people. History as such is construct of historians. Hence, it should not be treated as "a list of accomplishments by professors nobody outside the field knows". It is emerging area of intellectual activity. Thanks to Krakatoa for wikifying it. However, let us keep watch that only those who happens to add to development of the topic may participate. There is a major issue which was taken by Roy in his one article that digital history paradigm may develop a history as influenced by the demands of the people and ultimately the State. For this very possibility, it has been criticized and underrated by established historians adopting presently practiced methods in craft of history. --Sumir 02:51, 23 January 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sumir Sharma (talkcontribs)

Parts of the article are fairly dated and could benefit from additional notation on the field's engagement with Digital Public History over the last five years. Additionally, adding instituions outside of Europe that have incorporated Digital History into Undergrad and MA programs NChapman98 (talk) 22:20, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An excerpt from my article evaluation: All of the information presented in the "History" section reflects the evolution of digital history from a Eurocentric lens; there is no discussion of its use or appearance throughout the rest of the world. If there are not many sources on its use in other places, that should be made clear. The section mentions two different "roots" of digital history, but doesn't differentiate them underneath different subheadings, which is confusing for the reader. The first paragraph serves as a decent overall summary of Digital History, but stops at the early 1990s. More current information is needed. Following the first paragraph, the article refers to many digital history projects; this topic comprises the rest of the section, even though there is a separate section in the article for "Notable Projects". It would make sense to keep the first/biggest projects in the chronology, but others should be moved down to "Notable Projects". The last two paragraphs jump back and forth in time in a confusing way; I think this could be fixed only after heavily editing the number of projects mentioned. In order to make better sense of the "History" section, I suggest adding subheadings for each decade starting from 1960, then adding events underneath their respective location in time. If this suggestion doesn't work well I would maintain that there needs to be further organization. -ObservantOctopus (talk) 01:42, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Digital history. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:52, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Digital history. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:50, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Digital history. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:43, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]