Talk:Digital darkroom

This page talks a lot of crap... someone should really make it sound better but I'm too lazy. "as much RAM as possible and a large storage subsystem - big hard drives. RAID and external USB and" "nVidia and ATI are the preferred graphics cards for such a machine."

Yeah, I agree with this. It's a bit run of the mill sounding and not fairly accurate in regards to minimum requirements. The original author puts it more on par with full motion video editing requirements rather than stills. Laynec (talk) 07:38, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I suspect the majority of digital darkrooming is done by home users, most of whom don't use high spec machines, nor do they need to. 82.31.207.100 (talk) 07:11, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Italic 103.181.57.49 (talk) 10:07, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Misleading?

"Image Acquisition: entails downloading images from a camera or removable storage device or importing from a scanner. Windows XP and Windows Vista both include an inbuilt wizard for importing images"

Those 2 statements are technically true, but I think a bit misleading together. A wizard has nothing to do with the OS's ability to dl the images from a camera, which is something all mainstream OSes have been able to do for many years. All it requires is a file browser and USB capability, and you'd be hard pressed to find any modern desktop OS without those. 82.31.207.100 (talk) 07:11, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

7986248242

Sohil khan 103.181.57.49 (talk) 10:06, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sohil 103.181.57.49 (talk) 10:06, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]