Talk:Digital Reader 1000

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wikify

A version of this article was wikified by Sumsum2010, a member of WikiProject Wikify, on October 22, 2010. The project welcomes all editors with a good grasp of wiki markup to help improve articles. Visit our project page if you're interested in joining! If you have questions, please ask at our talk page.WikifyWikipedia:WIKITemplate:WikiProject WikifyWikify articles

[untitled]

The part below did not appear to be neutral. Therefore, I removed it, but kept it here to assist anyone who wishes to improve it.

Critics

In a market much more sensible to energy consumption and autonomy like that of ereaders, it is proved that battery life is not what advertised by Irex; also with the new 1.7 firmware, users are measuring about 12 hours of use. During product launch, Irex stated in the web products pages that this device will last days with one charge, and for some users this is considered a bad case of false advertisement. As a proof of that, after the release of 1.5 version, IRex removed the statement on the product page that the device "will last days", as a clear admission of poor battery choice for the reader. Look at real user opinions [1] and [2] and regarding 1.6 improvements [3]

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.80.203.194 (talk) 15:40, 23 September 2009‎ (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Digital Reader 1000. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

Attempted to fix sourcing for http://irextechnologies.com/irexdr1000/specs

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 14:30, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]