Talk:Digital Addressable Lighting Interface

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Networking task force.

It should definitively be merged.

merge it Back ache 08:15, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Advantages and disadvantages

The bulk of this article is in two sections, Advantages and Disadvantages. Unfortunately, this has produced an article that is essentially two lists of bullet points and, consequently, it fails to explain what DALI is and how it works. I recommend the following to remedy this:

Convert each pro/con point into a sentence, complete with explanation of the underlying relevant facts.
Delete the advantages/disadvantages sections, which should be empty when step #1 is complete.

Lambtron (talk) 13:46, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done. -- Lambtron (talk) 14:13, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Move to IEC 62386?

I think this page should be renamed 'IEC 62386 Digitial Addressable Lighting Interface' and be the official article for that standard, and linked from List_of_IEC_standards . Unless someone objects I will do it later.
I will also add sections for -101 and -102 as the latter is a new addition to the standard. Pontushammarback (talk) 23:58, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

At first glance I don't have a problem with moving it, but the article has been at this title for a long time and there are many links to it. Before moving it, I recommend that you restate this as a formal move proposal and provide a logical reason for the move. Also, it would be helpful to invite other editors to comment, and allow time for that to happen, before moving it. Lambtron (talk) 03:48, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Good points, thanks for feedback. As a noob around here I'm not exactly sure how to A) request formal move proposal, and B) invite editors. I'll certainly allow time first! Pontushammarback (talk) 01:37, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

To resolve this, I've restored the subject to the lead sentence per WP:BEGIN and created IEC 62386 as a redirect to this article. Lambtron (talk) 15:10, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Digital Addressable Lighting Interface. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130627012349/http://www.dali-ag.org:80/c/manual_gb.pdf to http://www.dali-ag.org/c/manual_gb.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:34, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]