Talk:Digit sum

Generalise

Would be nice if someone could add a more generalised rule to the mod 9 for base 10. I'm sure it would just be mod (base-1) but the answer could be more tricky to interpret. For example, in binary ds(101) = 10? Syndicate 10:45, 23 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

May I add some results for base 10?

Let σ(M) be the digit sum of positive integer M. We all know from casting nines that σ(9k+r)=r.

Suppose we want to find σ(314159265358979^{2718281828459045}). Let us state some basic operations and some periodicities:

σ(A+B)=σ(A)+σ(B); σ(A×B)=σ(A)×σ(B); σ(A^a)=[σ(A)]^a,
σ(2^6k+j)=1,2,4,8,7,5 for j=0,1,2,3,4,5, respectively.
σ(3^k)=1,3,9 for k=0,1 and k not smaller than 2, respectively.
σ(4^3k+j)=1,4,7 for j=0,1,2, respectively.
σ(5^6k+j)=1,5,7,8,4,2 for j=0,1,2,3,4,5, respectively.
σ(6^k)=1,6,9 for k=0,1 and k not smaller than 2, respectively.
σ(7^3k+j)=1,7,4 for j=0,1,2, respectively.
σ(8^2k+j)=1,8 for j=0,1, respectively.

For the example, 314159265358979=9m+5, and 2718281828459045=6k+5, so

σ(314159265358979^{2718281828459045})=σ(5⁵)=2.

69.158.119.184 18:41, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Adding sheree silver

I added info by a doctor in metaphysical philosophy upon advice from another user on the numerology page.Spring12 (talk) 22:37, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Inequalities

It seems to me if S(n) is a digit sum of n (in any base), then for any a,b:

S(a+b) <= S(a) + S(b)

S(a*b) <= S(a) * S(b)

I cannot find any reference for this on the internet. 94.113.5.84 (talk) 18:05, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

combine with digital root?

I was surprised that they're different pages — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.76.179.81 (talk) 04:55, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The digit sum and digital root aren't the same, as you can read in the Applications section of the article:

> The concept of a decimal digit sum is closely related to, but not the same as, the digital root, which is the result of repeatedly applying the digit sum operation until the remaining value is only a single digit. Polish bookworm (talk) 12:33, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Digit sum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060913155630/http://instruct1.cit.cornell.edu/courses/econ719/Edgeworth.pdf to http://instruct1.cit.cornell.edu/courses/econ719/Edgeworth.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:27, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]