Talk:Die Another Day (song)

Die Another Day (song) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Die Another Day (song) is part of the American Life series, a good topic. It is also part of the Celebration (Madonna album) series, a good topic. These are identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve them, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
November 23, 2013	Good article nominee	Not listed
March 14, 2014	Good article nominee	Listed
January 8, 2015	Good topic candidate	Promoted
April 21, 2024	Good topic candidate	Promoted
Current status: Good article

Madonna Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Madonna, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Madonna on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MadonnaWikipedia:WikiProject MadonnaTemplate:WikiProject MadonnaMadonna articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

James Bond (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject James Bond, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.James BondWikipedia:WikiProject James BondTemplate:WikiProject James BondJames Bond articles

Women in Music

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Music Video screenshot

It's a shame that there's no music video image in this song i mean second of the most expensive music videos of all time...common and Berbah is very suck at uploading. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.198.82.203 (talk) 13:23, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey look, there's an image now. Olicool11 (talk) 20:04, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Skyfall

It seems like a logical leap to bring in Skyfall in the opening of the article. If it was talking about all of the Bond singles and Die Another Day were superseded by Skyfall as the most successful one of all time (none of which is accurate) it'd be one thing but the way the sentence is structured the mentioning of Skyfall seems to be a flimsy pretext to name drop Adele's new song at best.

There isn't even a source to assert the idea that it has done better than Die Another Day. It just says it did better and leaves it there. Quite simply, the sentence should from start to finish should go "The song peaked at number three in the United Kingdom, selling 175,000 copies[3] – making it the most successful Bond theme since Duran Duran's "A View to a Kill" (1985)" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.252.142.216 (talk) 23:17, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Die Another Day (song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:10, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Die Another Day (song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:53, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Die Another Day (song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:38, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Australian Chart Performance

The Australian chart peak for "Die Another Day" is incorrect. The secondary site, Australian-Charts.com, lists incorrect information based on the initial publication of a singles chart listing "Die Another Day" at #11, but which was republished the next day when the error was discovered (showing "Die Another Day" at #5). An archival chart from www.aria.com.au clearly indicating a peak position of #5 for the single is available here: https://web.archive.org/web/20021204222559/http://www.aria.com.au/singles.htm Can this error be corrected, please? The secondary site is incorrect, whereas the primary site (i.e. Aria.com.au) is correct. I have contacted people at the secondary site to correct this error. If necessary, I can also provide a picture from the official ARIA chart anthology, which clearly lists the single's speak position as #5. Thanks in advance.1.132.110.177 (talk) 02:43, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for bringing this up and providing a source. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 09:28, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for sorting this out! Much appreciated.1.132.110.177 (talk) 00:11, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]