Jump to content

Talk:Dick Swaab

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Article problems

[edit]

This article was declined as a draft at AfC because it lacked independent reliable sources. The author pasted it into Wikipedia's main article space anyway. I've removed large parts of the article cited to Swaab's CV, also details about his immediate family (sourced to someone's genealogical research). Because Swaab has published so extensively and non-English language sources may exist to prove his notability as an academic, I've simply left a 'clean-up' hatnote for now. Sionk (talk) 22:58, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I had a quick look and am satisfied about notability, as he was the director of an institute at Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW) for 30 years. At the end of his official CV web page is a link for further info, which is a full CV of 168 pages. – Fayenatic London 20:40, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Both CV's are equally unreliable because they are no doubt written by Swaab. Sionk (talk) 21:50, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
He is a quite controversial scientist with some significant media interest http://www.theguardian.com/science/2014/jan/28/dick-swaab-sex-brain-theories-men-women-sexuality-womb. Been a while since he's had death threats but he was really unpopular at one point. I'll have a go at balancing the article to make it less of an advert. FMMonty (talk) 18:34, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Why use words that are not meaningful to readers in the US and possibly elsewhere?

[edit]

"famous"

"professor" is not a title in the US. We might say, "He teaches at ..."

"full professor" would be "and now teach at" in the US

MichelleInSanMarcos (talk) 21:52, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


[edit]

Some talk pages have room for this; now this one does. I came to this wiki page after finding a pay-for-full-view on-line review of Dr. Swaab's book "We are our Brains" in Acta Paedeatrica, http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/apa.12830/pdf 22:11, 27 November 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by MichelleInSanMarcos (talk • contribs)

Scientist is considered controversial

[edit]

Whilst Prof Swaab is a well known academic his fame comes from his controversy, not his dry academic credentials. @Hazelares Do you believe that the term controversial was not referenced, or was incorrect? FMMonty (talk) 00:13, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


While in the 1980's Swaab had very controversial idea's about sexual difference in the brain between hetero and non-hetero individuals, which caused lot of criticism, the last decades these idea's have become broadly accepted. As I am Dutch, I can tell that over here he is not considered to be controversial anymore, but rather labeled progressive in the Dutch media. Hazelares (talk) 13:29, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

How many English language articles can you cite showing his fame as a non controversial scientist? This should be fairly simple, however I am unable to establish him as famous or mainstream in his research (and this article doesn't help as it has no citations). FMMonty (talk) 17:28, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dick Swaab. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:19, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dick Swaab. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:21, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Dick_Swaab&oldid=1258934920"