Talk:Diatrizoate

Chemicals Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project of WikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.ChemicalsWikipedia:WikiProject ChemicalsTemplate:WikiProject Chemicalschemicals articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pharmacology

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Medicine Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ionizeable Hydrogen

Has anyone found how many of the attached hydrogens are ionizeable and can split off? There's the obvious in the OH group at the top, but can the two attached to the nitrogens split off as well? Kyoobur9000 (talk) 19:50, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not joking

This is going to sound like a joke, but it's not. I just took this stuff and on a whim looked it up. I imagine it's designed to infiltrate my tract rather quickly, so... is it supposed to work like a laxative to speed its way through? Because I seriously feel a BM coming on, and a rather... shall we say, soft one? Is this due to the Gastrografin? I don't expect an answer in the next ten minutes (I'm literally out the door for my cat scan), but I'd still be interested to know. --Buddy13 (talk) 21:28, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

brand name should go in intro

Gastrografin, Gastrovist, Gastrovision, MD-Gastroview etc should go in 1st paragraph — Preceding unsigned comment added by 163.40.12.37 (talk • contribs) 17:20, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

section on comparision to barium and other forms of contrast in relation to clinical use

and suspected dx. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 163.40.12.37 (talk) 17:20, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]