Talk:Diary of a Wimpy Kid: The Deep End/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Morgan695 (talk · contribs) 05:56, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Sadly, this nomination quickfails as it does not meet GA standards for breadth of coverage. Over two-thirds of the article's readable prose is a plot summary, with the other sections of the article being incredibly brief; the "Reception" section in particular is only two sentences, and cites only two reviews. (File:Diary of a Wimpy Kid The Deep End cover.png also needs a more substantive fair use rationale, but that's a relatively minor point.) I see that this is your first GAN, so please don't be discouraged by this outcome. The article simply needs to be developed further before it's ready for GA, and I think the best remedy here is to re-nominate the article after you've done that, either through your own edits or by soliciting feedback through a peer review. Morgan695 (talk) 06:11, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the feedback and the review. I'll keep your feedback in mind for future improvements to the article. Microwavedfork (talk) 06:35, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]