Talk:Diabetic ketoacidosis/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Did a review made a few corrections and I think this article passes. Congratualtions.

Final GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose):Very well written b (MoS (Med)): No important MoS ommissions

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): Very well referenced b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): The sources are reliable

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): Yes b (focused): Remains focused

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias: Yes

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.: Yes

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use withsuitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

--Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 04:54, 4 August 2009 (UTC)