Talk:Di (Five Barbarians)

Tasks

The Di people play a part in the early account of the xiongnu or Huns. I think it should stay. Some very oratorical and highly enthusiastic prose on the topic has been commented out. Despite its non-encyclopedic style it probably covers much of the material that should be covered, which indicates a clean-up should be undertaken rather than starting over. First and foremost I think we should work from an outline. Just to work that up is a pretty good task for a research paper (not original research). Who would like to do a term paper or a mini-thesis here? The author of the commented-out material I believe has done some other articles on China- or China-related subjects but they all appear to be short on citations and written in the same sprawling style, which I would say is a cross between essay and poetry. In short, it needs to be encyclopedic with plenty of footnotes giving books and articles. Lots of those are reviewable on Google and on educational sites. I think articles on the history of China are a good idea. We westerners need some balance; not everything is Greece and Rome.Dave (talk) 12:09, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

More informations : no source

"The Di were eventually assimilated into the main Chinese and Tibetan populations. Genetic evidence of the Di can be found in a minority of people in Sichuan."

Hi. What is the source of this claim, please ? Can I have more informations on this question ?

comment added by noz (talk) 20:14, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Race and origin

Are Di people an ancestor of the Xirong, Quanrong and Shanrong? Chinese sources described them as Causosoid people. Dersere (talk) 03:05, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Di (Five Barbarians). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120510092634/http://www.qiangzu.com/content/20120324_2448.html to http://www.qiangzu.com/content/20120324_2448.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:43, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]