Talk:Devon County War Memorial/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk · contribs) 21:37, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Will review tomorrow.♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:37, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Is it customary to use capital letters for "War Crosses"?

Generally no, but in this case "War Cross" is Lutyens' name for the design of his 15 cross-shaped war memorials so I've treated it as a proper noun (the sources do likewise). I'll get round to turning into a blue link at some point. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:35, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I shortened some of the longer sentences but I can't find much fault with this at all, good job!♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:23, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much! HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:35, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:

B. MoS compliance:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

Perfectly satisfactory for GA. Hope to see more at GAN!♦ Dr. Blofeld 20:43, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Good Afternoon! I just read your article and wanted to give you some feedback! I think the article was very informative. Your resources were reliable which helped me feel comfortable with the info and your credibility. I wouldve loved a translation to the Latin inscription on the memorial. In summary, I think you did a great job posting and presenting the info in a professional and unbiased manner! Nmateo1997 (talk) 18:19, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.