Jump to content

Talk:Developments in Islamabad

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Article !!!

[edit]

I am improving the article's references, and also the content...


Nabil rais2008 (talk) 15:24, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Developments in Islamabad. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:25, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Name change suggestion

[edit]

Name of this article should be changed from "Developments in Islamabad" to "Developments in Rawalpindi-Islamabad Metropolitan Area" King Eliot (talk) 05:20, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Referencing fixes

[edit]

I've again fixed the reference around Kingdom Valley Islamabad. The old reference used a dubious URL and was incorrectly formatted such that it would cause a referencing error and didn't render a useful footnote to the article. I don't think there's any reason for my fix to be reverted, but if you believe it isn't correct, please do discuss the issue here. -- Mikeblas (talk) 21:53, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]