Talk:Development of analogs of thalidomide
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
 | The contents of the Development of analogs of thalidomide page were merged into Immunomodulatory imide drug#Development on 29 February 2020. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
 | Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Development of analogs of thalidomide.
|
Proposed name change
[edit]This article is wrongly named; it is called "Discovery and development of thalidomide and its analogs" but the history section begins with "The history of Thalidomide is discussed in great detail at the Wikipedia Page for Thalidomide" followed by three references. That's not the way things are done at all and it just looks ridiculous. First of all, the references are supposed to support what the sentence states, and all the sentence says is that the subject is discussed in the link - which is self-evidently true and doesn't need references. As it is, the references have nothing to do with the previous sentence anyway. Secondly, you don't have an article about something that then tells you half of the information it is supposed to be giving is in another article. I propose that the article is moved to Development of analogs of thalidomide and the 'History' section has a short summary of the history from the Thalidomide article with a link at the top that says
Then the Thalidomide article should have a similar link at the top of its'Thalidomide analogs' section back to this article. There is also the problem that the article talks about thalidomide in the lead with no link to the Thalidomide article. It should actually begin with the name of the article bolded in the first sentence and the word "thalidomide" linked. Richerman (talk) 21:40, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
price
[edit]ysohigh????83.134.87.49 (talk) 23:16, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Development of analogs of thalidomide. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://archive.is/20140103191615/http://oncozine.com/profiles/blogs/how-a-vilified-drug-became-a-life-saving-agent-against-cancer to http://oncozine.com/profiles/blogs/how-a-vilified-drug-became-a-life-saving-agent-against-cancer
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:14, 9 September 2017 (UTC)